Ovarian Reserve Testing and Diagnosing Diminished Ovarian Reserve

Ovarian Reserve Testing and Diagnosing Diminished Ovarian Reserve

Dayna Browning, BSN, Jennifer Dwyer, BSN and Monica Moore, MSN, RNC

Edited by Paul Bergh, MD

A woman’s ovarian reserve refers to both the quantity and quality of her eggs, and diminished ovarian reserve means either or both of these factors are declining. 

Ovarian reserve testing specific for the quantity of available oocytes consists of biochemical and ultrasonographic tests that represent a snapshot of where a woman falls along this continuum. 

Surprisingly, women have the most eggs (oocytes) when they can least use them, prior to birth as a 20 week fetus! After birth, this oocyte pool dwindles until very few remain at the time of menopause. Ovarian reserve testing specific for the quantity of available oocytes consists of biochemical and ultrasonographic tests that represent a snapshot of where a woman falls along this continuum.  It’s critical to have an accurate assessment of reproductive potential when planning for pregnancy, whether utilizing advanced reproductive technologies (ART) or not. When proceeding with ART, ovarian reserve testing dictates stimulation protocols to avoid unwanted outcomes, like cycle cancellation or ovarian hyperstimulation.  Nurses are often the ones who interpret and review these results with patients, so in this article, we will explore the available tests, their applicability and pitfalls, and how best to discuss with the outcome with patients.  

Egg Supply Chart
Egg Supply Diminishes with Age

Regarding the quality of oocytes, the millions of eggs that represent a woman’s oocyte pool are dormant for years, arrested in meiosis (cell division for sex cells). The next time these oocytes are re-activated and meiosis resumes is after selection within the dominant follicle, at the time of ovulation with the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. So, at the time the oocytes are expected to resume cell division, they may have been paused in the middle of cell division from 13 years to as many as 40+ years. Cell division is a process that requires a significant amount of energy.  As eggs age, so do does the cell machinery that is crucial for efficient cell division. Accordingly, aging oocytes may not respond as well as younger eggs once recruited from the original supply. These older oocytes are less effective at correctly completing meiotic cell division and thus are at an increased risk for aneuploidy (an abnormal number of chromosomes in the embryo, which is often lethal).This is often the cause for the exponential decline in fertility and increase in miscarriage rates seen in women who attempt to conceive in their later reproductive years. This decline in the oocyte’s ability to complete meiosis error-free is a reflection of oocyte “quality” and, other than a women’s age, there is no way to evaluate the chance of oocyte meiotic error.  

Regarding quantity, the rate of follicular depletion varies considerably among women. Chronological age is an important factor when counseling infertility patients, but it’s important to note that two age-matched women can have very different levels of ovarian reserve. Although some lifestyle choices, such as smoking, trauma from surgery, or radiation/chemotherapy can be detrimental to oocytes, exercise and a healthy diet are important, but not necessarily protective. The fact that a fit, active woman in her 40’s can still have diminished ovarian reserve demonstrates the inescapable reality of ovarian aging.  

The fact that a fit, active woman in her 40’s can still have diminished ovarian reserve demonstrates the inescapable reality of ovarian aging.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is a term used to denote that the decrease in the oocyte pool has reached a level in which it impairs fertility. DOR occurs even in women with regular menstrual cycles. Those who are diagnosed with DOR can be counseled that they will have a lower response to stimulating medications, a higher cancellation rate, and a lower chance of pregnancy after an IVF cycle than an age-matched woman whose ovarian reserve testing is normal. 

Although it would be helpful if ovarian reserve testing reflected both the quality and quantity of the oocytes that remain (and are available for that particular patient), there is a stronger association between the outcome of the tests and the quantity of oocytes available, not their quality or competence. Research on the predictive value of the existing tests is mostly undertaken in the setting of a high-risk population, i.e. those who present to infertility centers, and caution should be taken when extrapolating these results to a low-risk group, such as women who have not been diagnosed as subfertile. The applicability of the results, then, should mostly guide clinicians about expected outcomes during ART cycles, for example, response to stimulating medications, possible cycle cancellation, and the chance for pregnancy after a treatment cycle. They are less reliable when used to predict the probability of a natural pregnancy or when menopause will occur. Also, no single test is predictive of reproductive potential and the patient’s medical history and clinical picture should always be considered when interpreting results.  

Historically, a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level on cycle day 2-4 was used as the ‘gold standard’ of ovarian reserve testing. FSH is produced by the pituitary gland and is an important hormone necessary for follicle growth, particularly small follicles. As a follicle grows, it produces estradiol (E2) and inhibin B, and the increase in these hormones decreases the release of FSH from the pituitary. So adequate early follicular levels of E2 and inhibin B maintain FSH at normal levels. E2 and FSH levels are inversely proportional, so lower E2 levels would signal the pituitary to increase the production of FSH. As a result, it is important to also draw an E2 level when an FSH is drawn to assure that E2 is not elevated (>60-80 pg/ml) which would falsely lower FSH. As women age, the quantity and quality of the follicles that they produce declines.  A poor-quality follicle (or a reduction in the number of follicles) results in an E2/inhibin B levels not high enough to provide negative feedback to the pituitary to reduce the production of FSH, so it is over-secreted. Consequently, elevated FSH levels on day 2-4 can be an indicator of diminished ovarian reserve. An FSH level >10 mIU/ml, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2nd international standards, is considered a sign of decreased ovarian reserve. FSH alone, though, seems to be a limited measure of ovarian response. It’s specificity and sensitivity vary in the literature, and it’s a poor predictor for pregnancy and live birth, particularly for young (<35 y/o) patients. As a result, most clinicians do not rely on this level alone when counseling patients.  

A dynamic measure of ovarian reserve, that has been used in the past but is no longer widely used, is a clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT).  Women undergoing this test have an E2 and FSH level drawn on day 2-4 of their menstrual cycle. Then, 100 mg of clomiphene citrate is taken orally on days 5-9, and an FSH level drawn on day 10. This has been termed a ‘stress test’ for the ovaries as it might show how ovaries respond to stimulation and reveal more subtle DOR that may be concealed by using a static test/single level. This test is in effect a bioassay of the inhibin B response of the follicle.  Clomiphene citrate blocks estrogen’s negative feedback to the pituitary and the hypothalamus, however inhibin B produced by the follicles is not blocked by clomiphene citrate and is still recognized by the brain. In a normal CCCT test, with a sufficient inhibin B response, the FSH with the day 10 blood work should still be suppressed to the normal levels expected on day 3. Recently, though, other methods are increasingly used over this test as some feel that there is only a minimal to moderate benefit over testing FSH levels alone (if any) and is not necessarily cost-effective. As a result, some centers opt to use this test for patients in whom they suspect a poor response to stimulation (over the age of 35, I.e.) whereas others do not use this test at all.  

Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) is starting to emerge as the preferred measure of the quantity component of ovarian reserve. AMH is a hormone secreted by the granulosa cells that surround the early, small (up to 4 mm) follicles in the ovary. Normal levels are lab-specific, but many use >1.0 ng/ml as the cut-off. AMH expression is not gonadotropic-dependent, so can be drawn at any time during the menstrual cycle.  Levels peak at 25 years of age and decrease with age (the opposite of FSH), with a level <1.0 mg/ml indicating diminished ovarian reserve and very low levels can be seen about 5 years prior to menopause. Elevated AMH levels also have clinical utility, as they would suggest a robust ovarian response, and have been shown to correlate with an increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). AMH can be helpful in predicting the response to gonadotropin stimulation, and possibly pregnancy rates. The data is mixed regarding the predictive value of AMH levels and live birth, although there is some evidence that it might be better than FSH levels in this regard.  Also, in women without a history of infertility, a prospective, randomized study found that low AMH levels do not predict a decrease in fecundity as compared to those with normal levels. AMH might also be useful in assessing the need for fertility preservation strategies. The data on AMH as being a reliable predictor of natural fertility is mixed, though, larger studies are needed to elucidate this.  

As stated above, the follicles which become dominant and ovulate are just the ‘tip of the iceberg’ and demonstrate the immense attrition rate seen with normal human aging. Only 0.1% of oocytes present at birth make it to ovulation. Every month, a small portion of follicles (containing oocytes) are drawn from a woman’s egg supply in the hopes of being selected to become a dominant follicle.  Around day 5-7 of a 28 day cycle, the follicle which has the most FSH receptors becomes dominant and the remaining follicles get reabsorbed by the body. Measuring the number of small (2-10 mm), antral follicles that are present by ultrasound on day 2-4, then, before dominant follicle formation, termed the Antral Follicle Count (AFC) is a helpful measure of ovarian reserve as it can be appreciated that the lower the overall egg supply, the lower the number of follicles available to be recruited. These are the follicles that contribute to the AMH level so it is no surprise that the AFC is highly correlated with AMH levels. This is supported in the literature as women with a lower AFC are more likely to have cancellation for poor response in IVF cycles. The literature is mixed regarding with the lower limits for AFC are, there is some agreement that less than a BAFC of <3-6 is concerning.

Poor AFC

Poor AFC
Poor AFC

Normal/Good AFC

Good AFC
Good AFC

Although not well-established until the last decade, AMH and AFC seem to be emerging as the best approaches to procreative testing, as they are the most accurate in predicting poor response to IVF (better than FSH). They are also better at predicting hyper-response and elevated levels of either should alert the clinician to the possibility of OHSS. Although AMH seems to be superior to FSH in predicting live birth, data is conflicting regarding its ability to predict miscarriage rates.  

Treatment of DOR 

Very few treatment options are available when a woman has been diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve. One reasonable, and affordable, strategy is advising the patient to begin supplements such as DHEA (Dehydroepiandrosterone) and Coenzyme Q10. DHEA is in a class of steroid hormones known as androgens which are at peak levels in humans in their mid-20s. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is an antioxidant that your body produces naturally to use for growth and maintenance and plays a key role in mitochondrial function. There has been recent data that suggests DHEA improves ovarian function, increases pregnancy chances and, by reducing aneuploidy, lowers miscarriage rates. Similarly there is also data that Coenzyme Q10 can not only help preserve the ovarian follicle pool, but also facilitates ovulation of gametes able to support normal development. Other suggestions include maintaining a healthy lifestyle and avoiding factors that can impair fertility such as an elevated BMI and smoking.  

 Historically, it was thought that superovulating patients with diminished ovarian reserve gave them the best chance of pregnancy during a treatment cycle, but a growing body of research suggests that ‘mini’ or ‘mild IVF’ might offer outcomes similar to conventional IVF cycles. Conventional IVF consists of the administration of high-dose external hormonal injections with the goal of developing a large quantity of oocytes. These oocytes are retrieved during a surgical procedure and later fertilized with sperm in a controlled laboratory setting. In mild ovarian stimulation, or mini IVF, an oral ovulation induction agent such as clomiphene citrate or letrozole is initially used, followed by the administration of low-dose injections to stimulate follicular growth. Because this approach leads to less oocytes retrieved, it can be done with local anesthesia as opposed to general anesthesia. The cost is also less because less injections are used. When comparing conventional IVF and mini IVF, a study found that there is fair to good evidence that clinical pregnancy rates are not substantially different between two types of stimulation in women predicted to be poor responders.  

Counseling the Patient 

When couples begin their fertility journey they are seeking answers as to why they are unable to conceive or have been experiencing recurrent pregnancy losses.  A comprehensive diagnostic workup is the first step to treatment and, for many women, it is found that they have diminished ovarian reserve.  Receiving and accepting this message, and its ramifications, is incredibly difficult for patients. As REI nurses it is our responsibility to assist in counseling the patient on appropriate care measures based on their results.  Although it is more common to see a decline in ovarian reserve in women over the age of 35, this unfortunately can affect women of all reproductive ages.  If a woman’s ovarian reserve testing (hormone levels, follicle count) falls within a normal range, a less invasive option such as IUI (Intrauterine Insemination) may be recommended as first line treatment.  However, if a woman is shown to have signs of diminished ovarian reserve (low AMH, high FSH, low AFC) she would need to be counseled on the importance of aggressive fertility treatment such as IVF to optimize her chance of success for a current and potential future pregnancy, the higher chance of cycle cancellation, and the lower chance of pregnancy when compared to women her age with normal ovarian reserve.  It is important to share with the patient that as she gets older her reserve and egg quality/quantity will continue to decline.  This is especially pertinent for women who want to have multiple children, so ovarian reserve testing results should be taken into context with the couple’s family-planning goals, such as how many children would they ideally like to have.   

One of the most difficult and emotionally-charged treatment options to discuss with a patient is the potential need for OD or ED (Oocyte or Embryo donation), as it requires that she accepts the inability to use her own eggs and agree to use someone else’s, a huge shift in her family-building perspective and the loss of a life-long dream.

One of the most difficult and emotionally-charged treatment options to discuss with a patient is the potential need for OD or ED (Oocyte or Embryo donation), as it requires that she accepts the inability to use her own eggs and agree to use someone else’s, a huge shift in her family-building perspective and the loss of a life-long dream. When delivering this sensitive news to the patient or couple it is important to be forthcoming , but empathetic and sensitive as well (Review How to Deliver Bad News here).  Realize that the patient needs to essentially grieve the loss of her fertility.  When making this phone call, make sure there is adequate time to discuss results and answer any follow-up questions the she (or her partner) may have. So be prepared that this call might take more time and allow for that when planning your day.  Setting realistic expectations for the patient in terms of recommendations for treatment and the potential for success is crucial.  Keep in the mind that the patient may not readily accept your news and may have an understandably defensive or aggressive reaction.  Reminding the patient that you are available as a form of support will allow them to express their feelings and concerns once they are ready.  Offering additional support resources for the patient such as speaking with a social worker, or scheduling a follow up appointment with their physician can be offered as well.   

Ovarian reserve testing provides important information regarding likely reproductive outcomes in infertility populations. AMH and AFC are emerging as the more widely used tests to evaluate the quantity of oocytes remaining. Evaluating the quality of the remaining oocyte pool remains elusive though is often correlated with age. Currently there is no real treatment for women with DOR, but supplements and personalized stimulation protocols are options. When ovarian reserve testing results are abnormal, nurses need to realize that this news can be devastating to a patient. As a result, time and care should be taken when making the phone call to deliver these results, considering the patient’s clinical situation and desire for family-building.

slot gacor

toto

toto togel

link gacor

slot gacor

slot gacor

kampungbet

slot gacor

situs gacor

situs togel

slot gacor

situs toto

link slot

toto

situs gacor/a>

kampungbet

kampungbet

Endometrial Receptivity and the ERA biopsy

Endometrial Receptivity and the ERA biopsy

Everyone would agree that functionality of the uterine lining is incredibly important for implantation of the blastocyst to take place. The question of how to measure this, termed ‘uterine receptivity’, has been studied extensively in the literature. The methods that have been used in the past were indirect, assumptive and not reproducible. Researchers in Spain have created a new tool which has been shown to be promising for identifying molecular markers for uterine receptivity.

Remarkably, as the blastocyst floats within the uterine cavity looking for a place to land, a dialog takes place between the blastocyst and the endometrium. In order for a successful implantation to take place, the blastocyst needs to be at the appropriate stage, and it needs to signal the uterine lining to ‘accept’ it. Within the uterine cavity, once ready for implantation, the microvilli present on the trophoblast cells of the blastocyst act as one side of ‘velcro’ to adhere it to the uterine lining. The embryo is in search of a receptive endometrium (the other half of the velcro) which will ‘fasten it’ to the uterine wall. The hormonal preparation of the uterus plays a critical role each month in creating this environment in which the blastocyst can adhere to the endometrium in the hope that implantation will take place.

The uterine lining undergoes changes during the two phases of the menstrual cycle that prepare it for blastocyst implantation. During the proliferative phase, it grows due to the increasing production of estrogen by the ovaries. The second phase is called the secretory phase where the production of progesterone, produced by the corpus luteum, converts the endometrial lining to a secretory one, changing the cells to prepare for implantation (a process called decidualization). Should implantation not take place, the hormone levels will fall, resulting in a shedding of the lining, which results in menses. Studying the mid-secretory phase is of great importance since the window of implantation (WOI) takes place then. The sweet spot of WOI is approximately a 2-day period when the uterus is prepared to accept the implantation of a blastocyst. Conventionally, it was assumed that every woman had the same WIO, (approximately 8-10 days after ovulation) so embryo transfers would be scheduled to take place during this time. This theory has recently been challenged, with researchers proposing that the WOI can vary among women.

Research has been done extensively to detect and determine criteria necessary in order to call an endometrium ‘receptive’. In the past, this was done using histological criteria, i.e. the microscope appearance of the endometrium (termed the Noyes Criteria). Certain days of the menstrual cycle have typical microscopic characteristics and a pathologist would determine if the sample looked like day 16 or 17..etc (dates were reported with ovulation normalized to day 14-so an endometrium that was day 17 by Noyes Criteria should be 2 days post ovulation). As one can imagine, there is much variability and subjectivity in this interpretation between pathologists, plus womens’ cycles can show considerable variability. Also, just because the cells have the appearance of a typical cycle day 16, for example, doesn’t mean that the lining is actually receptive. That would just be implied. As a result of these limitations, and some recent studies that found this morphological dating method to have poor predictive value, this method of assessing uterine receptivity is no longer widely used.

One can also look at the appearance of the lining by ultrasound in the late proliferative phase. Many studies have focused on the endometrial thickness and type (triple-line vs homogenous appearance). Although the lower limit of an acceptable lining has not been agreed-upon by researchers or practitioners (most would arguably be satisfied with a lining of 7 mm or above) that information is a reflection of the adequacy of the proliferative phase, which tells us that the lining was properly primed by estrogen, but doesn’t give us any information other than that. Ultrasound in the secretary phase is not helpful, as it shows a thick, homogenous lining that doesn’t usually affect clinical decision-making, so is not routinely performed.

Over the last decade, different ways of studying the endometrial lining more directly have been investigated, first by attempting to identify the substances that were generated at the time of implantation, the cytokines, adhesion molecules and other proteins. To date, this line of investigation has been unsuccessful, so the focus has shifted to the stage that leads to the production of these substances, the stage of RNA transcription. Transcriptomics allows the study of gene expression by looking at the mRNA produced. It can provide a molecular profile of the status of the endometrium by telling us what genes are actually “turned on”. Gene expression profiling is now widely used for other disciplines, such as tumor classification.

With the relatively recent advent of DNA microarray analysis we can measure the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously, allowing us to explore which ones are expressed in the mid-secretory phase, when implantation takes place. The discovery of this technology was a major turning-point in the study of endometrial receptivity and several studies were undertaken to determine which of these genes were important during the WOI. Researchers agree that there is a specific and unique action that takes place during the process of transcription, when RNA creates the ‘script’ for a protein, in order for the endometrium to become receptive, but the identification of the specific genes involved was elusive until recently. A group in Spain identified 238 genes related to endometrial receptivity and collected the data to create a tool, named the endometrial receptivity array or ERA (Diaz-Gimeno, et al 2011). This test purports to identify if an endometrium is receptive or not based on the mRNA profile or the endometrial gene expression. It further differentiates the non-receptive category into pre- or post-receptive) in natural or hormone-replacement (HRT) cycles, regardless of it’s appearance by ultrasound or under the microscope (histological). This group then applied their tool by testing it on patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) by performing a multi-center, prospective study. What they found is that the WOI was ‘displaced’ in 26% of the women with RIF, so in 1 out of 4 patients with RIF, dysynchrony between the blastocyst and the endometrium might be to blame (Ruiz-Alonso, et al, 2013). They then did a second ERA test on the patients who had the displaced WOI to confirm that by adjusting the progesterone start or transfer day (see more on this below) increased implantation rates. They performed a subsequent adjusted embryo transfer (termed a personal embryo transfer or pET) and demonstrated a 50% pregnancy rate and a 38% implantation rate in this group of patients (which is the rate similar to the control group who did not fail a treatment cycle). This data supports the concept that the conventional window of implantation differs among women (at least a fourth of us) maybe only slightly in some cases, but enough to preclude implantation.

The test is performed in the secretory phase of either a natural cycle or a hormone replacement (HRT) cycle. If during a natural cycle, then the biopsy is done on LH surge + 7 . If during an HRT cycle, then the biopsy is performed on exogenous progesterone start + 5 (120 hours post start of progesterone). The biopsy sample is sent to the lab and analyzed (this takes approximately 2 weeks) and results are termed either ‘receptive’ or ‘non-receptive’. If non-receptive, it further analyzes the sample as pre-receptive or post-receptive. If pre-receptive, then the patient needs more time (hours or days) of progesterone, so the progesterone is started earlier or the transfer is moved later. If post-receptive, then the WOI has already passed, so the recommendation would be to start the progesterone later or move the transfer earlier. The recommendation is to repeat the cycle after modifying it according to the suggested intervention (more or less days of P) and the biopsy is redone to confirm that the endometrial tissues sent now receptive. This step is center-specific with some practices often performing a repeat mock cycle with biopsy and others only occasionally repeating it, but still using the recommended progesterone modifications for the frozen embryo transfer cycle, thereby creating the patient’s personalized embryo transfer(called pET). For more information on the specifics of the results and testing criteria, see the video here.

Although the data collected so far is promising, there are some limitations in the study design that should be considered when interpreting results. One is that all of the studies performed so far have relatively small sample sizes. Another is that there was no effort (in most studies) to separate out the embryo quality so that this important variable could be controlled. (There is a recent, retrospective study, in Japan where the researchers only transferred back euploid embryos with optimistic results, but it was retrospective and had a small sample size.) Furthermore, in the initial ERA studies, the non-receptive group was not further stratified to include a segment who did not have pET prior to their next transfer, so it is not known if they would have been pregnant just due to trying again, without further intervention. Finally, keep in mind that if 25% of RIF patients had a displaced WOI, 75% did not, implying that there are other factors (embryo quality among them) that could be the cause of implantation failure.

The importance of determining the timing of endometrial receptivity has always been emphasized in reproductive endocrinology. Now, instead of just relying on the way the endometrium appears, either by ultrasound or microscopically, some researchers suggest that we have the added benefit of being able to study the molecular changes that happen within the endometrium and act on these results to form a personalized prescription for subsequent transfers. Although exciting, further studies are needed to confirm this small subset of studies and also to determine if this test will be useful for an expanded group of women (Currently it has been suggested that it should be offered to those who have failed >2 IVF cycles or >1 donor oocytes cycle.) Methods of non-invasive testing are also being explored and might be a viable option within the next decade. The idea that every woman has their own personalized window of implantation (and that we can determine and take advantage of this) is a new and exciting concept in REI.

Special thanks to Paul Bergh, MD, FACOG For his assistance with editing this article.

slot gacor

toto

toto togel

link gacor

slot gacor

slot gacor

kampungbet

slot gacor

situs gacor

situs togel

slot gacor

situs toto

link slot

toto

situs gacor/a>

kampungbet

kampungbet

kampungbet

kampungbet

situs gacor

Why Didn’t I think of this before? The Life Lesson that I Learned at a Tennis Clinic

Disruptor – I thought it was just the name of a Pearl Jam song.

It’s a term that I learned about a few weeks ago at a tennis clinic, although I’m sure that most (savvier than me) people have already heard of it.

In tennis, it has to do with your opponent disrupting your rhythm or comfortable playing style. If you like to hit hard, they hit soft, lob or drop shot. I hate those matches, honestly. They are not fun and I often lose to opponents who are, in my opinion, not as good/athletic as me. And then I complain about losing and how “not fun” the match was. I take my long car ride home kicking myself for not respecting their game and forcing my way of hitting on them which, clearly, didn’t work.

The coaches at this clinic (the awesome Billy and Matt Previdi) told us that not only should we respect disruptors, but that we should become one. What? Why would I lower myself to that?

Because that’s how you win. Unless, of course, I don’t want a winning outcome, but to stay in my comfort zone – playing the same way that I usually do, but losing.

In business, disruption can lead to innovation. Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen describes disruption as something that “displaces and industry or market and produces something new, more worthwhile or efficient.” Forbes.com describes disruption as both, “destructive and creative.” Think Invisalign vs braces.

Sudden disruptions can happen to us at any time. For example, I have PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome). When I was first diagnosed, I thought, “how am I going to live with this for the rest of my life?” It felt unfair, punitive, and overwhelming. Over time, I have learned how to manage it and see it as an impetus for positive, healthy living. It’s almost like I feel accountable to it. It’s the reason that I see exercise as a form of stress management, yoga as a healthy way to get a buzz, and am empowered by what my body can do as opposed to how my body looks.

I think the reason the concept of a ‘disruptor’ resonated with me because I realized that is what PCOS is.

It produced a new, efficient and worthwhile way of life.

It was both destructive and creative. Now, I can’t imagine living without it.

I see some women who could eat and drink whatever they wanted, struggling with weight gain after a pregnancy, or just over time as we have aged. I notice that many use food or alcohol as their only means of stress release (I do drink, by the way, just in case my friends are reading this and want to call me out). I hear women in stores and dressing rooms everywhere bemoaning not fitting into a pair of jeans or dreading bathing suit season. I’m not criticizing these women because I was one of these women. It’s just that I’m mostly over it now.

I’ve learned to love my lowest sustainable weight, not my skinny weight.

I’m proud that I can run a race or go on a long hike or bike ride on short notice because I stay active all of the time. I’m proud that my girls are more interested in their cross country running times than the size of their jeans, and that they think it’s worthwhile to empower other girls as opposed to competing for space, popularity or social media likes with them.

I’m proud because I never thought I would be a proponent of these behaviors before I was diagnosed with PCOS, and now I model them for my girls.

I’ve learned to respect and not fear the disruptor. Because of it, new inventions, systems and lives can be generated.

Subscribe to Fertile Health Happenings

* indicates required



Tell us a little about yourself


kampungbet

situs bola

toto togel

slot gacor hari ini

link gacor

toto slot

slot gacor

slot gacor

slot gacor

bandunghoki

situs toto

toto slot

situs toto

link gacor

slot gacor

toto togel

slot gacor